1887

oa Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa - Article 13 84( I) of the Mauritius Civil Code - the continuing story

 

Abstract

It seems clear that there will be a departure from the pure Mangroo decision relating to a presumption of fault liability restricted to situations where the loss is caused by the act of the thing alone. The moves suggested in Emamally and Coonjab are certainly within the Mauritius tradition and yet would provide a better protection for victims of road accidents. The move hinted at in the Bata Shoe Company case is however a move away from the Mauritius tradition and a simple acceptance of what the French courts are doing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/cilsa/13/2/AJA00104051_916
1980-07-01
2016-12-03
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error