1887

oa Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa - Currency problems in transactions extending beyond one legal unit

 

Abstract

This article uses comparative law to challenge the justification of the assumption of a contrary "rule" by the judge in Voest's case which, however, he was unable to "find". There is, as pointed out in the article, no statute law in the Republic which requires judgments to order payment in South African currency only. While in terms of section 2(1) of the Currency and Exchange Act 9 of 1933 loans in former money may at the option of the debtor be repaid in money which is legal tender at the time of payment, section 14 of the South African Mint and Coinage Act 78 of 1964 provides, as regards contracts, etc made in the Republic relating to money, for the execution in money which is current and legal tender, but expressly reserves the right to stipulate for money in a foreign currency. The Reciprocal Enforcement of Civil Judgments Act 9 of 1966, which, however, is not yet in force, provides in section 3(2) that where any amount payable under a judgment to be registered is expressed in a currency other than the currency of the Republic.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/cilsa/18/3/AJA00104051_738
1985-11-01
2016-12-05
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error