- Home
- A-Z Publications
- Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa
- OA African Journal Archive
- Volume 2, Issue 2, 1969
Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa - Volume 2, Issue 2, July 1969
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 50 (2017)
-
Volume 49 (2016)
-
Volume 48 (2015)
-
Volume 47 (2014)
-
Volume 46 (2013)
-
Volume 45 (2012)
-
Volume 44 (2011)
-
Volume 43 (2010)
-
Volume 42 (2009)
-
Volume 41 ([2008, 2009])
-
Volume 41 ([2008, 2009])
-
Volume 40 (2007)
-
Volume 39 (2006)
-
Volume 38 ([2005, 2006])
-
Volume 38 ([2005, 2006])
-
Volume 37 (2004)
-
Volume 36 (2003)
-
Volume 35 (2002)
-
Volume 34 (2001)
-
Volume 33 (2000)
-
Volume 32 (1999)
-
Volume 31 (1998)
-
Volume 30 (1997)
-
Volume 29 (1996)
-
Volume 28 (1995)
-
Volume 27 (1994)
-
Volume 26 (1993)
-
Volume 25 (1992)
-
Volume 24 (1991)
-
Volume 23 (1990)
-
Volume 22 (1989)
-
Volume 21 (1988)
-
Volume 20 (1987)
-
Volume 19 (1986)
-
Volume 18 (1985)
-
Volume 17 (1984)
-
Volume 16 (1983)
-
Volume 15 (1982)
-
Volume 14 ([1982, 1981])
-
Volume 14 ([1982, 1981])
-
Volume 13 (1980)
-
Volume 12 (1979)
-
Volume 11 (1978)
-
Volume 10 (1977)
-
Volume 9 (1976)
-
Volume 8 (1975)
-
Volume 08 (1975)
-
Volume 07 (1974)
-
Volume 6 (1973)
-
Volume 06 (1973)
-
Volume 5 (1972)
-
Volume 4 (1971)
-
Volume 3 (1970)
-
Volume 2 (1969)
-
Volume 1 (1968)
Volume 2, Issue 2, July 1969
-
Table of Contents
Source: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2 (1969)More Less
-
Front Cover
Source: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 0 –0 (1969)More Less
-
The permanence of Roman Law concepts in the Continental Legal Systems and in South African Law*; with an addendum on The permanence of Roman Law concepts in South African Law**
Source: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 181 –205 (1969)More LessViewed in its entirety, there can be no doubt that the South African legal system with its large common law orientated areas deserves its classification as a hybrid system. However, one might ask oneself what factors really determine a system's classification. This is not the place to examine this question in depth, but taking the main continental systems as examples, one may be tempted to think that it is mainly the nature (concepts etc.) of their private, and possibly their criminal, law which determines their classification as civil law systems, rather than the comparatively new branches of public or commercial law.
-
Practical Jurisprudence in Rhodesia (Conclusion)
Author R.H. ChristieSource: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 206 –221 (1969)More LessThe Rhodesian revolution offers a variation on this normal pattern because the revolutionaries did not oust the whole of the old order, but left the judiciary undisturbed and submitted their actions to the scrutiny and judgment of this same judiciary.
-
Recent modifications in the French Law of Commercial Companies
Author Michael R. WillSource: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 222 –241 (1969)More LessIf the main object of the actual company law reform in France has been to give more rights to shareholders and to the general public, one must admit that, on the whole, the reformers have succeeded in many other respects too, especially in bringing about the codification of 1966. The Companies Act of that year certainly represents a landmark in French legal history.
-
The nature and object of copyright
Author Allen CopelingSource: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 242 –253 (1969)More LessThe legal subject of a right is the bearer of the right; the legal object of a right is that property, material or immaterial, in respect of which the legal subject enjoys those privileges accorded him in terms of the right. It is in this latter sense that I have used the word ""object"" in the title of my lecture. Copyright may be defined as that right.
-
The Rhodesian crisis and the Courts
Author Donald B. MoltenoSource: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 254 –289 (1969)More LessThis is the first of a series of three papers. This paper deals with the legal effect of the Southern Rhodesia Act, 1965, passed by the British Parliament in response to the Unilateral Declaration of Independence of the Rhodesian Ministers, and the Order in Council (S.l. 1952) authorized by the Act.
-
Republic of South Africa v. Sea-Polluters and Others: A preview of an important Conference
Author J.F. HeyneSource: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 290 –312 (1969)More LessGreat expectations of South Africa on the outcome of the Conference and its ability to ""legislate"" effectively are nourished.
-
From Private International Law to Transnational Commercial Law
Author Eugen LangenSource: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 313 –320 (1969)More LessIn future, commercial law will, without any legislative measures being required in any country, have to be separated from the classical doctrine of Private International Law in such a way that the determination of the applicable national law is simultaneously accompanied by the search for a settlement which is within the framework of the freedom of contract based upon transnational rules of a bi-national or multi-national kind. Such a procedure has the great advantage that it can be applied with equal ease by arbiters and state-employed judges.
-
Current legal development
Source: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 321 –349 (1969)More Less
-
An Introduction to International Law, by J.G. Starke; The Protection and encouragement of Private Foreign Investment, edited by J.G. Starke: Book review*; American Conflicts Law, by Robert A Leflar: Book review**; Vicarious liability and the Law of Torts, by P.S. Atuyah: Book review***; International law, by H.B. Jacobini: Book review**
Source: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 2, pp 350 –361 (1969)More Less