1887

oa Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa - Working for progressive change in South African courts

 

Abstract

The introduction of a bill of rights and the consequent demise of parliamentary sovereignty demands a reassessment of judicial interpretation in South Africa. The current changes in South Africa are the result of mobilisation and organisation by the oppressed and disempowered majority, not the benevolence or altruism of the courts. The object of this article is not to provide an exhaustive account of the interpretative approach of South African judges during the apartheid era. This has already been done by better qualified scholars. Rather, it will focus on the two models of judicial interpretation applied in South Africa in the adjudication of apartheid laws. First, the 'plain fact' approach based on legal positivism, and second, the common law approach based on the writings of Ronald Dworkin. It will conclude that neither of these provides an adequate account of the role of South African law in progressive social struggle in either apartheid or post apartheid South Africa, and that promoting one or the other prescriptively has had very little impact on the decisions of the courts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/cilsa/28/2/AJA00104051_416
1995-07-01
2016-12-03
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error