1887

oa Codicillus - Towards a selective awarding of punitive damages awards in South Africa? A comment on

 

Abstract

In some jurisdictions punitive damages are generally considered appropriate and deterrent punishment for malicious or egregious behaviour; and for the vindication and compensation of rights and freedoms violated. In , the South African Constitutional Court held that there was yet no place for punitive constitutional damages. The Court took a purist approach to the civil and criminal law divide. However, the court obiter stated that punitive damages against private corporations might be justified. In the light of the court's obiter statement and the judgment in , the status of punitive damages appears to be now more vexed. Punitive damages notionally exist in South Africa despite the indication that, in general, punitive damages may not be recovered. Ideally, the South African position on punitive damages could be clarified through legislative intervention. The special features of such legislation should include a special liability trigger clause, and a clause controlling and limiting the amount of damages recoverable.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/codi/48/2/EJC27534
2008-01-01
2016-12-04
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error