oa Conspectus : The Journal of the South African Theological Seminary - Interpreting parables : one point or many?
|Article Title||Interpreting parables : one point or many?|
|© Publisher:||South African Theological Seminary (SATS)|
|Journal||Conspectus : The Journal of the South African Theological Seminary|
|Author||Zoltan L. Erdey|
|Publication Date||Jan 2010|
|Pages||5 - 24|
|Keyword(s)||South African Theological Seminary|
Two modes of parable interpretation have dominated much of church history. The first and most dominant was allegorization, in which each element in the parable narrative was contrasted with a real life referent, thought to communicate an enigmatic or spiritual truth. In contrast to the allegorical exegetical method is the single-lesson interpretive model, which advocates that parables teach a single lesson. None of these interpretive models are adequate, for they either oversimplifying or unnecessarily allegorising the parables of Jesus. The model recommended by Blomberg, which views the parables as teaching one, two, or three lessons, contingent on the number of main characters in the parables, avoids the pitfalls on the two extremes, and ought to be adopted as the standard evangelical model.
Article metrics loading...