n Journal for Contemporary History - Floor-crossing : a controversial democratic process
|Article Title||Floor-crossing : a controversial democratic process|
|© Publisher:||University of the Free State|
|Journal||Journal for Contemporary History|
|Publication Date||Jun 2007|
|Pages||130 - 148|
In October 2002 the Constitutional Court gave politicians permission to cross the floor and join another political party without losing their seats. This ruling has made a significant impact on the country's political landscape. From the onset, it was crystal clear that the vast majority of ordinary people or voters disapproves of the floor-crossing extravaganza. Jonathan Faull (2004) of the Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) argues that this disapproval gives rise to increasing feelings of alienation from democratically elected institutions within the voting public. To support this concern, Kormuth (2005) writes in The Mercury that votes are mandates of political origin. To cross the floor from the opposition to the governing party is a direct, wilful and inexcusable betrayal of that mandate.
Article metrics loading...