n Journal for Contemporary History - Die wanresepsie in die Suid-Afrikaanse reg van die gemeenregtelike vir onvermoënde debiteure

Volume 34, Issue 2
  • ISSN : 0258-2422
  • E-ISSN: 2415-0509



In addition to (the forerunner of voluntary surrender) and (safe-conduct or vreygeley suspending arrest or detention, DG Van der Keessel, one of the great and last Roman-Dutch authorities, identified three beneficia available to impecunious debtors in the in the eighteenth century : and .

provided an effective procedure whereby creditors of an impecunious debtor could be induced to agree to a moratorium. and in essence involved the declaration of a moratorium on a petition showing that a postponement of obligations was equitable in the circumstances and necessary to restore the liquidity of a debtor.
In this contribution the various and the important and valuable role they could have played in South African law are analysed. The three South African decisions at the turn of the nineteenth century, all by judge Kotzé, resulting in the unnecessary abrogation of the , are evaluated and criticised as contextually incorrect and historically unsensitive. It is emphasised that South African courts have continued to rely on principles and concepts underlying these common law in the interpretation of modern moratory legislation.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Article metrics loading...


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error