1887

n Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology - The paradoxes and dilemmas of expertise in the criminal justice process

This is currently unavailable for purchase.

 

Abstract

"If matters arise in our law which concern other sciences or faculties, we commonly apply for the aid of that science or faculty which it concerns, which is an honourable and commendable thing in our law". (Buckley v Rice Thomas (1554) 1 Plowd 118 at 124)


Thus reads the earliest authorative judicial dictum found in English law on the need for expert assistance. The term "expert" used as an adjective can be defined in the following terms: "skilful, skilled, trained, knowledgeable, learned, experienced, practised". An expert is defined "as a person with the status of an authority (in a subject) by reason of special skill, training or knowledge; a specialist". An expert in the legal process therefore needs to possess sufficient specialised knowledge, skill, training or experience to enable him to supply information and opinions not generally available to members of the public (R v Van Schalkwyk 1948 2 SA 1000 (O); S v Bertrand 1975 4 SA 142 (K) 149 B-C; S v Van den Berg 1975 3 SA 354 (O) 357G; S v Adams 1983 2 SA 577 (A) 586A).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/crim/13/3/EJC28652
2000-01-01
2016-12-06
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error