1887

oa De Rebus - Perverts' rights are also worthy of constitutional protection

 

Abstract

In the case of Bell v S (in which the accused appealed against a magistrate's order committing him to prison to await the final decision of the Minister of Justice with regard to his extradition to Australia) Mr Bell was accused of having committed many offences that those of us with 'conventional' sexual preferences would decry as turpitude of the worst kind. But, the lewdness of his alleged conduct notwithstanding, Mr Bell still has rights - some of which are enshrined in the Bill of Rights contained in the Constitution. It is my submission that Mr Bell got a raw deal from our courts with regard to the protection and assertion of his constitutional and common law rights.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/derebus/1998/366/AJA02500329_7013
1998-07-01
2016-12-08
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error