1887

oa De Rebus - Bad practice continues : who must administer an oath in criminal proceedings? : practice note

 

Abstract

Despite the provisions of s 162(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (the CPA), supported by precedents of decided cases, the practice of allowing court interpreters to administer the oath in criminal proceeding still continues, especially in remote areas. This often occurs when the presiding judicial officer is not familiar with the language that is commonly used at that particular district where he or she presides, thereby allowing witnesses to be sworn in by interpreters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/derebus/2016/560/EJC184631
2016-01-01
2016-12-03
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error