1887

oa Fundamina : A Journal of Legal History - : wat vertellen we onze studenten?

 

Abstract

To what extent do Dutch textbooks on Roman law reflect the controversy that has continued for almost a century over the interpretation of caput 3 of the lex Aquilia? In 1945, Van Oven discussed the relevant literature of his day, but since then Kaser's view has been favoured, even though, in 1976, Feenstra inclined towards Daube's alternative interpretation of and this led to the ongoing debate. The interpretation of caput 3 is clearly more controversial than students are usually led to believe.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/funda/2014/si-1/EJC159269
2014-01-01
2016-12-02
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error