1887

oa Fundamina : A Journal of Legal History - su D. 25.2.2 (Gai. <10> )

 

Abstract

The article offers an exegesis of a short text from Gaius' edictal commentary, now included in the Digest title (D. 25.2.2, originally dealing with the consequences of the ). The aim of this paper is to reject the position saying that could not be suited by way of infamous actions. For D. 25.2.2 bans a no more than (i.e. a "shameful trial" against the spouse), it concerns only the inner familiar relationship between husband and wife. So the fragment cannot be used as a general statement, valid for all women. Therefore it was normal to summon a woman with an (and also with an ). On the basis of the Gaian fragment, the extent of use of the word addicta remains uncertain, but there is no reason to argue that women could not be subjected to .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/funda/2014/si-1/EJC159276
2014-01-01
2016-12-08
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error