1887

n HTS : Theological Studies - The adjudication of miracles : rethinking the criteria of historicity : original research

Volume 65, Issue 1
  • ISSN : 0259-9422
  • E-ISSN: 2072-8050
USD

 

Abstract

This is the second article in a series of two that discusses whether historians are within their professional rights to investigate miracle claims. In the first, I made a positive case that they are and then proceeded to examine two major arguments in support of a negative verdict to the issue: the principle of analogy and antecedent probability. I argued that neither should deter historians from issuing a positive verdict on miracle claims when certain criteria are met and the event is the best explanation of the relevant historical bedrock. In this second article, I examine three additional objections commonly appealed to by biblical scholars: the theological objection, lack of consensus and miracle claims in multiple religions. The resurrection of Jesus is occasionally cited as an example.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/hervorm/65/1/EJC36449
2009-01-01
2017-12-18

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error