1887

n Investment Analysts Journal - Do long memory and asymmetries matter when assessing downside return risk?

Volume 45, Issue 3
  • ISSN : 1029-3523
  • E-ISSN: 2077-0227
This article is unavailable for purchase outside of Africa

 

Abstract

In this paper we set out to test whether, on sector level, returns series in South Africa exhibit long memory and asymmetries and, more specifically, whether these effects should be accounted for when assessing downside risk. The purpose of this analysis is not to identify the most optimal downside risk assessment model or to reaffirm the often regarded stylised fact of the existence of long memory and asymmetry in asset returns series. Rather, we set out to establish whether accounting for these effects and allowing for more flexibility in second order persistence models actually leads to improved downside risk assessments. We use several variants of the widely used GARCH family of second order persistence models that control for these effects, and compare the downside risk estimates using Value-at-Risk measures of different model formulations and compare the out-of-sample performances. Our findings confirm that controlling for asymmetries and long memory in volatility models improve risk management calculations.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/invest/45/3/EJC195926
2016-01-01
2018-05-24

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error