n Institute for Security Studies Papers - Implications of the AU decision to give the African Court jurisdiction over international crimes
|Article Title||Implications of the AU decision to give the African Court jurisdiction over international crimes|
|© Publisher:||Institute for Security Studies (ISS)|
|Journal||Institute for Security Studies Papers|
|Affiliations||1 University of KwaZulu-Natal and 2 Institute for Security Studies|
|Publication Date||Jun 2012|
This paper considers the decision by the African Union (AU) to expand the jurisdiction of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights to act as an international criminal court with jurisdiction over the international crimes of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, as well as several transnational crimes. At an AU meeting from 14-15 May 2012 a draft protocol to effect that expansion was approved and has been recommended to the AU Assembly for adoption.
The short time frame which the AU has provided for the complex task of drafting the protocol occurs against the backdrop of the fractured relationship between the AU and the International Criminal Court (ICC). The process of expanding the African Court's jurisdiction is fraught with complexities and has implications on an international, regional and domestic level. All these implications need to be considered, particularly the impact on domestic laws and obligations, and the relationship between African states parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC, the ICC itself and the African Court.
Article metrics loading...