1887

n Without Prejudice - Independence of the NPA - the devil in the detail : the law

USD

 

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Appeal, in [2011] ZASCA 241, deliberately ignored the difference in wording throughout the Chapters, which is very specific and designed to achieve a deliberate purpose. In doing so, it committed a fallacy by using perfectly valid premises to arrive at a somewhat incoherent, incongruent and thus invalid conclusion. This is that the silence of Constitution means the courts, the executive and the legislature must ignore the letter of the Constitution and rather paint all state institutions, established in terms of the Constitution, with the same "" brush because the general theme selectively supports the moral inclination that independence must be read in.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/jb_prej/12/7/EJC125548
2012-08-01
2016-12-09
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error