n Without Prejudice - Setting us up for more legal uncertainty : intellectual property

Volume 7, Issue 11
  • ISSN : 1681-178X



When comparing these draft amendments, as discussed in Part 1 (November 2007 p 40) with the provisions of the Counterfeit Goods Act (CGA), the following conflicts cannot be ignored:

Though the right-holder under the draft bill may decide to lay a criminal charge against the affected party, he must also institute civil proceedings, failing which the goods will be released. s78D(5) specifically provides that "" where the right-holder fails to apply to court within the specified period, the person in charge of the counterfeit goods depot, which will be the storage facility of the detained goods, must, at the request of the commissioner release the goods to the affected party.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Article metrics loading...


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error