1887

n Annual Survey of South African Law - Environmental law

USD

 

Abstract

Two cases that were discussed in the equivalent chapter in the 2010 were taken on appeal during 2011. In ([2011] ZASCA 141), the Supreme Court of Appeal was faced with two issues. In essence these were whether the recipient of rights in terms of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 (MPRDA) required () approval of rezoning of the land in question in terms of the applicable provincial planning legislation, the Western Cape Land Use and Planning Ordinance 15 of 1985 (LUPO), and () an environmental authorization in terms of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA). The court had decided that the mining rights (I am using this term to include all mining-related rights under the MPRDA) holder was legally required to comply with the requirements of both LUPO and NEMA. In other words, a decision to grant mining rights under the MPRDA did not trump the legal requirements of planning and environmental authorization.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_assal/2011/1/EJC142857
2011-01-01
2016-12-06
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error