1887

oa Juta's Business Law - Blowing the whistle

 

Abstract

In this article I shall discuss certain terms used in the Protected Disclosures Act 26 of 2000 (the 'PDA') and the recent decision in [2007] 4 BLLR 327 (LC), which dealt with the legal position of an employee who makes a general protected disclosure.


The PDA provides that no employee may be subjected to any occupational detriment by his or her employer on account of, or partly on account of, having made a protected disclosure' (s 3). The PDA must be read with section 186(2)(d) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (the 'LRA'). It states that an 'occupational detriment' (other than a dismissal) suffered by an employee on account of having made a protected disclosure constitutes an unfair labour practice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_jbl/15/4/EJC52609
2007-01-01
2016-12-06
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error