1887

n Acta Juridica - Dismissal for misconduct - ghosts of justice past, present and future

USD

 

Abstract

The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 fails to articulate a normative foundation from which the right not to be unfairly deprived of work security might be derived. While the courts have established that the determination of a fair sanction for workplace misconduct necessarily entails a value judgment, they have failed to recognise that principled decision-making requires a coherent conception of justice. I review the various conceptions of fairness that have served to underpin the South African law of unfair dismissal since its inception. To the extent that a balancing metaphor of employer versus employee interests is currently employed to determine the fairness of the sanction of dismissal, I suggest that this model is flawed. A conception of justice more closely aligned with constitutional values of dignity and autonomy requires that the sanction of dismissal is a rational response to employer goals of economic efficiency, and that a relationship of reasonable proportionality exists between the sanction and those goals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_jur/2012/1/EJC125103
2012-01-01
2016-12-06
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error