1887

n South African Journal of Criminal Justice - Pacemakers and 'living wills' : does turning down a pacemaker to allow death with dignity constitute murder?

USD

 

Abstract

Recently the death of a dying comatose patient was prolonged by about 60 hours before a medical practitioner could be found who was prepared to turn down the pacemaker even though the patient had made a living will stating that he did not want to be kept alive by 'artifi cial means' or with 'artifi cial support'. <br>This paper deals with the meaning and status of 'living wills'; the right of patients to refuse medical treatment; whether the words 'artifi cial means' and 'artifi cial support' in a 'living will' include pacemakers; and the legal position when turning down the pacemakers of 'brainstem dead', persistent vegetative state, and comatose non-persistent vegetative state, patients. <br>The paper concludes that a doctor who turns down the pacemaker of a patient who is brainstem dead or in a hopeless persistent vegetative state may not be charged with murder. A doctor who turns down the pacemaker of a comatose patient may or may not be charged with murder -- depending on the circumstances. In order to obtain a proper informed consent doctors should discuss end-of-life decisions with their patients, including the advisability of making a 'living will'.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_sajcj/18/1/EJC52836
2005-01-01
2016-12-08
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error