1887

n South African Law Journal - A dangerous precedent indeed - a response to C R Snyman's note on : notes

USD

 

Abstract

2007 (5) SA 30 (CC) (hereafter ) is inherently controversial. The facts of the case, the unlawful anal penetration of a 9-year-old girl, strike at the heart of our social fabric. The legal issues at stake, such as the principle of legality, the separation of powers and the Constitution, strike at the heart of our legal order. It is thus unsurprising that the judgment in has elicited critical commentary. This is a direct response to one such comment, C R Snyman's recent note 'Extending the scope of rape - A dangerous precedent' (2007) 124 677 (hereafter 'Snyman'). Snyman addresses the following four issues in his note as they pertain to the judgment in : the principle of legality; separation of powers; the constitutionality of the common-law definition of rape; and whether the court was unduly swayed by emotional considerations. This comment refutes his stance and the reasoning employed in relation to each of these issues.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_salj/125/4/EJC53849
2008-01-01
2016-12-09
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error