1887

n Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif - The potential role of a general enrichment action

USD

 

Abstract

In light of the fact that the Supreme Court of Appeal's "prospective recognition" of a general enrichment action in CC 2001 3 SA 482 (SCA) is likely to be confirmed only after this issue has been properly argued in an appropriate case, this article takes the opportunity again to make the case for such an action and to give some idea of what its scope might be.


It argues that a general action should be recognized because it amplifies the ability of our law of obligations to correct injustices that arise between individuals, which, at present, are tolerated because the reach of the specific enrichment actions is too restricted, and because the neither the law of contract nor the law of delict is adapted to respond appropriately to these injustices. It argues, on the one hand, that the action must be subsidiary to the existing enrichment actions in order that its scope will not be unnecessarily wide, but also argues, on the other hand, that its elements must to a certain extent be flexible to ensure that its scope is not unduly limited.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_slr/20/3/EJC54717
2009-01-01
2016-12-06
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error