1887

n Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif -
[Discussion of () 2011 3 SA 274 (CC)]

USD

 

Abstract

The reasoning set out in the judgment of the majority of the Constitutional Court in () 2011 3 SA 274 (CC) has been criticised and commented upon for a number of reasons. This case note assesses some of that critique and finds that it is well founded. More than that, I conclude that the alternative argument that it offers is preferable to the opinions expounded by the Court in the case. Although the dissenting judgment of Yacoob J takes a different approach, given the fact that it reaches a similar conclusion, I conclude that it ought to have won the day.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_slr/24/2/EJC148394
2013-01-01
2016-12-03
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error