1887

n Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg - Judicial deference and rights

USD

 

Abstract

The demand that judges show appropriate deference to the judgments of the elected branches and administrative agencies - a requirement that has received considerable attention recently - is both understandable and justified. Although the idea of deference has been given "a thoroughly bad press" by the capitulation during apartheid of the judiciary to a legislature and an executive determined to abuse power in the service of racial discrimination, many think that in post-apartheid South Africa the elected branches should be the primary agents of transformation. People expect judges to provide meaningful and effective protection of rights; nevertheless, judges are often, with justification, regarded as "part of democracy's supporting cast, not its star performers".

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_tsar/2006/3/EJC55055
2006-01-01
2016-12-08
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error