n Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg - Artikel 3(1) en (2) van die Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 van 2002 : 'n herbeskouing
|Article Title||Artikel 3(1) en (2) van die Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 van 2002 : 'n herbeskouing|
|© Publisher:||Juta Law Publishing|
|Journal||Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg|
|Author||P.J. Badenhorst and Hanri Mostert|
|Publication Date||Jan 2007|
|Pages||469 - 493|
ISI Social Science
Sections 3(1) and 3(2) of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002
This contribution entails a discussion of the impact of section 3 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act on various aspects of the new mineral and petroleum law. At the core of the discussion is the question of how this section is interpreted by various commentators, and the implications of the different opinions on the application of the section. The initial discussion highlights problems with the new definition of a "mineral": Soil, including topsoil is at present included in die definition of a "mineral" in the act. The definition should be rectified by the legislature as it has far-reaching consequences in respect of the extent of the state's power in terms of section 3(2) of the act to grant entitlements in respect of minerals, including topsoil. The implications of section 3 for the control and management of minerals are discussed and placed in the context of the question about the constitutionality of the act. It is argued that legislative guidance is urgently needed to clarify continuing uncertainty, caused by sloppy drafting and different opinions about the connection between private law and public law in relation to minerals and the actual position of existing right holders.
Article metrics loading...