1887

n South African Journal of Sports Medicine - Evaluating the quality of science in exercise and sports medicine : editorial

USD

 

Abstract

With the increasing ease with which information can be obtained from the internet, it is becoming more important to be able to discern 'good quality' information from 'not-so-good' information. This even applies to scientists who are accustomed to the process of peer review. Information on the internet often breaks from convention where scientists aspire to have their research papers published in high-impact journals. The practice of striving to publish in high-impact journals is based on the assumption that high-quality research papers are associated with high impact factor (IF) journals. However, this assumption is not always fulfilled. This is because the IF of a journal was originally developed by librarians to rank journals; it was not designed as a marker of the quality of the research papers published in the journal.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/m_sajsm/25/3/EJC142393
2013-01-01
2016-12-07
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error