1887

n South African Medical Journal - Voluntary male medical circumcision : debate : forum

Volume 102, Issue 3
  • ISSN : 0256-9574
  • E-ISSN: 2078-5135
USD

 

Abstract

The thoughtful editorial by Professor Ncayiyana concerning the national circumcision programme in South Africa rests on two central arguments: first, that the scientific evidence is insufficient to justify such 'serious energy, money and resources', particularly when circumcision programmes have the potential of diverting money from other more effective interventions; and second, that risk compensation (the potential increase in risky behaviour after circumcision) may nullify any benefits of circumcision.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/m_samj/102/3/EJC67768
2012-03-01
2017-10-21

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error