n South African Medical Journal - South African Guidelines Excellence (SAGE) : efficient, effective and unbiased clinical practice guideline teams : editorial
|Article Title||South African Guidelines Excellence (SAGE) : efficient, effective and unbiased clinical practice guideline teams : editorial|
|© Publisher:||Health and Medical Publishing Group (HMPG)|
|Journal||South African Medical Journal|
|Affiliations||1 Stellenbosch University, 2 Stellenbosch University, 3 Stellenbosch University, 4 University of Santo Tomas, Philippines, 5 South African Medical Research Council and 6 South African Medical Research Council|
|Publication Date||May 2016|
There is increasing worldwide interest in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). A range of different evidence-based methods for CPG activities have been established (e.g. Schünemann et al., Brouwers et al., Brouwers et al., Hillier et al. and Guyatt et al.), and there is common agreement in these that poorly conceived CPG team composition and management can jeopardise CPG integrity. Recognised CPG initiatives such asthe Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) (http://www.sign.ac.uk) and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance) therefore provide guidance on CPG team construction and management. This editorial is the third in a series produced by the South African Guidelines Excellence (SAGE) team. Project SAGE is funded by a South African Medical Research Council Flagship Grant (2014 - 2017). In our two previous editorials we discussed the critical components of a good-quality CPG and the work being undertaken by Project SAGE to explore and better understand the development, implementation and use of CPGs in the South African (SA) primary care setting. In this editorial we outline steps for effective, efficient and outcome-focused CPG team membership, roles and management.
Article metrics loading...