1887

n Evidence Based Summaries in Dentistry - Laboratory versus controlled clinical trial results : high-viscosity glass-ionomers in comparison to amalgam for tooth restorations

USD

 

Abstract

Summarised from:


Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Do Laboratory Results concerning High-ViscosityGlass-Ionomers versus Amalgam for Tooth Restorations Indicate Similar Effect Direction and Magnitude than that of Controlled Clinical Trials? - A Meta-Epidemiological Study. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0132246.

A large percentage of evidence concerning dental interventions is based on laboratory research. A simple PubMed search (27 August 2014) of the dental literature published between 2009 - 2014, using the broad MeSH terms "Dental Amalgam" and "Glass Ionomer Cements" reveals a 2-3, as well as an over 7 times higher number of listed citations of laboratory (including in-vitro and animal based in-vivo) studies than of prospective clinical studies with control groups (including randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, split-mouth trials and prospective 2-arm observational studies), respectively. The apparent wealth of laboratory evidence is sometimes used as basis for clinical inference and recommendations for daily dental practice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/midebs/5/2/EJC182118
2015-01-01
2016-12-06
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error