1887

n Journal of Minimum Intervention in Dentistry - Retention of conventional GIC versus RM-GIC restorations - a brief quantitative systematic overview

Volume 4, Issue 5
  • ISSN : 1998-801X
USD

 

Abstract

to appraise and present detailed quantitative evidence in answer to the review question; whether restorations placed with either conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) or resin-modified GIC (RM-GIC) have the same retention.


The trials were identified from a search of the PubMed database on 15 December 2008 using the terms: "Glass Ionomer Cements"[Mesh] AND resin modified AND ("Dental Restoration, Permanent"[Mesh] OR "Dental Restoration, Temporary"[Mesh]) AND material retention". References of accepted articles were checked for additional studies suitable for inclusion.
Relevant to review question; Published in English; In-vivo or In-situ study design; Study on human subjects and human tissues; Randomised and quasi-randomised control trials; Contain computable (dichotomous) data for both, test- and control group.
The systematic literature search found 1 trial in line with the inclusion criteria. Of these, 4 individual datasets were extracted and analysed.
The result of all datasets showed no difference between low viscosity GIC and RMGIC. More clinical trials are needed.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/mident/4/5/EJC75767
2011-01-01
2017-01-17

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error