oa Wound Healing Southern Africa - A pilot study of Cutimed® Sorbact® versus ACTICOATversus Silverlon® for the treatment of burn wounds in a South African adult burn unit : general review
|Article Title||A pilot study of Cutimed® Sorbact® versus ACTICOATversus Silverlon® for the treatment of burn wounds in a South African adult burn unit : general review|
|© Publisher:||Medpharm Publications|
|Journal||Wound Healing Southern Africa|
|Affiliations||1 Houseman Mediclinic Louis Leipoldt, 2 Houseman Mediclinic Louis Leipoldt and 3 Houseman Mediclinic Louis Leipoldt|
|Publication Date||Jan 2015|
|Pages||22 - 29|
|Keyword(s)||ACTICOATÂ?, Cutimed and SilverlonÂ?|
Background: Since significant clinical data are unavailable on the use of Cutimed® Sorbact® in burns, a decision was taken to test it againstthe best anti-infective dressings used in our burns unit.
Method: A random prospective study was conducted in which Cutimed® Sorbact® was compared with control products, ACTICOAT and Silverlon®. Selected patients had partial- or full-thickness burns.
Results: Thirteen patients were included in the pilot study. Fifty-seven dressing areas were tested. A statistical difference between the tested product and the control products was not found through either clinical observation or microbiological analysis.
Conclusion: This pilot study confirmed that the Cutimed® Sorbact® dressing was safe when treating burn wounds over a three-day period. In addition, the potential to use it on earlier or fresher burn wounds warrants the further study of Cutimed® Sorbact® as a potential skin substitute.
Article metrics loading...