1887

n African Zoology - Phylogenetic relationships in the genus (Rodentia : Muridae)

Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN : 1562-7020
  • E-ISSN: 2224-073X
This article is unavailable for purchase outside of Africa

 

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships in the genus &lt;I&gt;Aethomys&lt;/I&gt; were examined based on qualitative cranial data for all currently recognized species. A cladistic analysis suggested the presence of three clades: 1) <I>A. bocagei, A. thomasi, A. silindensis, A. kaiseri, &lt;/I&gt; and <I>A. nyikae&lt;/I&gt;; 2) <I>A. chrysophilus, A. ineptus&lt;/I&gt; and <I>A. hindei&lt;/I&gt;; 3) <I>A. granti, A. namaquensis, &lt;/I&gt; and <I>A. stannarius</I>. These phylogenetic groupings are largely inconsistent with previously postulated supraspecific relationships for the genus. Nonetheless, relationships within each clade broadly correspond with some previously suggested evolutionary hypotheses among some members of the genus, the only notable exception being a close affinity between two southern African taxa (<I>A. namaquensis&lt;/I&gt; and <I>A. granti</I>) and the geographically disjunct West African endemic, <I>A. stannarius</I>. A phylogram derived from an analysis of anagenetic divergence among taxa supported the widely-held view of a close affinity between <I>A. namaquensis&lt;/I&gt; and <I>A. granti&lt;/I&gt; that has traditionally led to their inclusion in the subgenus &lt;I&gt;Micaelamys.&lt;/I&gt; These results are relatively concordant with recent molecular studies based on microcomplement fixation of albumin, mitochondrial DNA cytochrome &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt; and 16S rRNA data, which collectively suggest that the genus &lt;I&gt;Aethomys&lt;/I&gt; is paraphyletic. Possible paraphyly is also reflected by a relatively low bootstrap value at the node uniting all ingroup taxa in this study, as well as previous studies on dental morphology, modes of karyotypic change, and gross sperm and bacular morphology, and strongly supports the taxonomic elevation of the currently recognized subgenera &lt;I&gt;Micaelamys&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;Aethomys&lt;/I&gt; to full generic rank. Despite the broad correspondence between the morphological and molecular data, homoplasy and low bootstrap support in the present investigation point to the need for a careful consideration of the power and choice of morphological characters in future studies on this and related groups of murine rodents.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/afzoo/40/2/EJC17967
2005-10-01
2019-09-18

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error