1887

n Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe - Fundamentele massakommunikasienavorsing as 'n voorwaarde vir gesubstansieerde mediakritiek : navorsings- en oorsigartikel - : navorsings- en oorsigartikel

Volume 52, Issue 1
  • ISSN : 0041-4751

Abstract

Die kernargument in hierdie artikel is dat 'n "nuwe" samelewing en 'n "nuwe" gedigitaliseerde medialandskap tot 'n verlies aan diepgang en intellektuele kwaliteit in die media gelei het. Massakommunikasienavorsing, wat met 'n fokus op die effek, invloed, mag en tegnologie van die media self al hoe meer markgerig geword het, kon nog nie daarin slaag om 'n bydrae tot 'n verbetering in die kwaliteit van die media te lewer nie. Die rede is dat die fokus op die mark ten koste van fundamentele navorsing oor die media as geskied. Slegs deur weer te konsentreer op daardie fundamentele kommunikasiekonstrukte wat in die media werksaam is en wat die media as definieer, sal massakommunikasienavorsing weer 'n bydrae tot die verbetering van mediakwaliteit kan lewer. Die bydrae sou daarin kon setel dat dit mediamakers opnuut bewus maak en bewus hou van die verantwoordelikheid van dit waarmee hulle besig is, naamlik betekenisskepping en betekenisgewing oor die mens en die werklikheid en dat dit op 'n representatiewe, retoriese en dialogiese wyse gedoen word.


Teen die agtergrond van hierdie argument word daar in die artikel aandag gegee aan (i) die krisis in die media (as kommunikasie), in die besonder die krisis van die joernalistiek (as die vlagskipgenre van die media), en (ii) die strekking van dekades se mediateoretiese, sosiologiese, politiek-wetenskaplike en kultuurstudiekritiek teen die media. In dié verband word die essensie van Pierre Bourdieu se uitwysing van die van die joernalistiek, Kenneth Minogue se uitwysing van die van die joernalistiek en die joernalistiek as ideologie, en Frans Aerts se siening oor die van die media, uitgelig. Ten einde die klem terug te plaas op die media as , en as basis vir 'n terugkeer tot meer fundamentele massakommunikasienavorsing, word vier kommunikasiekonstrukte ingelei: betekenisgewing, representasie, retoriek en dialoog.


The main argument in this article is that the "new" postmodern society and "new" digitised media landscape have contributed to a loss of intellectual depth in the media. Because mass communication research focuses mainly on the impact, effects, functions and power of the media, and in the process has itself become mainly market orientated, there is a lack of fundamental mass communication research focusing on the nature of mass communication as communication. As a result mass communication research does not contribute to improving the quality of the media in postmodern society and the new media landscape. To substantiate this argument the following are dealt with in consecutive parts of the article:
It is argued that the new digitised media landscape and the "new" hybrid and fragmented postmodern society have contributed to what can often be described as mainly trivial and insignificant media content. This, and especially journalism, is criticised mainly from the perspectives of critical media theory, sociology, political science and cultural studies. The essence of this criticism ranges from criticism against the political economy of the media and the impact thereof on content and form to critique against the superficial, sensationalist, gossip-mongering nature of journalism. This kind of criticism is also related to the criticism of the political-cultural movement , in which the focus is on the industrialisation and commercialisation of human experience. It is argued that the media, in providing mainly commercialised representations of reality and human existence, contribute to this condition. After a discussion of the so-called crisis of journalism with reference to inter alia the dubious relationship between journalism and democracy, journalism's decline of authenticity, the problem of identity, and the problem of objectivity, these matters are further substantiated with a specific consideration of the sociological critique of Pierre Bourdieu, the political critique of Kenneth Minogue and Frans Aerts' cultural criticism. The emphasis is on Bourdieu's identification of the structural limitations of journalism and the journalistic profession, Minogue's focus on the corrupting devices and Aerts' views about the banality of journalism. They are in agreement on the lack of intellectual depth as the main reason for the failure of journalism and the media.
Having outlined the main criticism against the media, and particularly journalism as the flagship genre of the media, it is concluded that despite the value of the criticism, the criticism itself is often too media deterministic and for that reason often unsubstantiated. It fails to address the fundamental nature of the media as . The article concludes with an argument and an indication of how a focus on the basic constructs of the media as can contribute to substantiated criticism. The constructs are signification (how the media, through deliberate choices and processes of selection, signify meaning), representation ( interpretations of the world and human behaviour), rhetoric (the repetitive treatment of questions related to identity) and dialogue (through, , interactivity and intertextuality). Each of these constructs are briefly introduced and it is argued that focusing on them from a multimodal perspective can provide a more grounded description of the media and the nature of media communication in a media sphere.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/akgees/52/1/EJC20273
2012-03-01
2019-08-19

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error