n Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe - Geskiedeniswetenskap en die Nuwe Suid-Afrika - moet die Suid-Afrikaanse geskiedenis herskryf word? : navorsings- en oorsigartikel - : navorsings- en oorsigartikel

Volume 52, Issue 2
  • ISSN : 0041-4751


Daar word uit verskillende oorde aangedring op die herskryf van die Suid-Afrikaanse geskiedenis. Dit kan maklik op valse veronderstellings en verwagtinge gebaseer wees. Neem in ag dat geskiedenis as mensgerigte wetenskap fokus op voortdurende inherente verandering. Die skryf van geskiedenis bied talle struikelblokke. Enkele voorbeelde verdien vermelding. Eerstens is die verlede-werklikheid onherhaalbaar. Die dialoog moet multikulturele gesigspunte erken. Beskikbare en toeganklike bronne is beperk. Nuwe vorme van uitbeelding ontwikkel.

Postmoderne historici neig om geen finale antwoorde te verskaf op die talle vrae aan die verlede-werklikheid nie. Dit beteken dat daar nooit finale bevindings in die Suid-Afrikaanse geskiedenis kan wees nie. Dit moet in die lig van veranderende omstandighede in die hede voortdurend hersien word. Geskiedskrywing bevat slegs gedeeltelike waarhede aangesien die volledige verlede-werklikheid onbereikbaar bly.
Historici van die Suid-Afrikaanse toneel moet vandag diverse persepsies op 'n verantwoordelike en eerlike wyse hanteer, gebaseer op die beskikbare getuienis. Heersende mites moet ontbloot word en teenswoordige vrae relevant toegelig word uit die beskikbare bronne. Daar is ruimte vir nuwe perspektiewe en 'n meer insluitende Suid-Afrikaanse algemene geskiedenis, sonder om die baanbrekerswerk van talle historici in die verlede te verkleineer.

History is a discipline of humanities which records and analyses past events. It is a narrative or chronicle of human endeavour and experience in time. Constant change is an intrinsic characteristic of all forms of history. Traditional cyclical views of history have long ago been replaced by a linear cognisance and presentation of past events in a chronological sequence, implying a beginning and an expected fulfilment. This means that previous individuals, societies and developments are unique. Consequently, the question arises whether it is of any use to acquire a thorough knowledge of past events and achievements. A qualified YES would be the appropriate answer.
Change is a paradoxical idea. It is the notion of alteration combined with the notion of remaining the same. According to Michael Oakeshott change is nothing other than inherent continuity. One should distiguish between the past as such and written history. The historian must rely on multiple voices of the past, sometimes called representations of pastness. Such evidence of the past may be found in written documents, oral recollections and artefacts. The historian can never truly know the complete reality of the past. It is the historian's duty to reveal existing myths and to convey to the world what they discover about past reality in order to promote the legitimate use of history and check the abuse of this vital human science.
From the explanation of historical scholarship mentioned above it seems unfair and unnecessary to ask whether South African history should be re-written at the commencement of the twenty first century. In the re-writing of South African history new issues, challenges and opportunities must always be addressed within the context of our particular time and environment in a responsible manner. In present day South Africa historians are faced with a complex, fragmented and heterogeneous rainbow nation. A truly South African identity is in continuous development. This requires constant re-interpretation, revision and re-writing of history, based on all available and accessible sources. Each generation is bound to write its own history. Today the wheel of history has undoubtedly turned, due to fresh and challenging questions asked by a new generation.
During the previous century four distinct phases of South African history developed, namely English orientated liberal history, Afrikaner nationalistic history, Marxist radical history and Africanist nationalistic history. Today the re-interpretation of South African history demands a new perspective of the South African position within the global household. In a multi-cultural society each group will have to maintain its own particular or private history to appreciate its own identity. Such individual histories may subsequently contribute to a more general and balanced history of South Africa. During the past two decades van Aswegen's , Liebenberg en Spies' and Giliomee and Mbenga's attempted to re-interpret our past. Such representative histories can never be final. The result will always remain open and incomplete. A multi-perspective approach to the past seems to be, however, the most acceptable and appropriate focus on the vast and intricate background of South Africa's unique population.
A few guidelines may serve the purpose of achieving a comprehensive history of South Africa in our present situation. We need to take account of the different prevailing traditions and perceptions of past reality in our communities. We must avoid a tunnel vision in our research approach and appreciate the fact that South Africa is an integral part of the world at large. In a truly democratic society historical consciousness and knowledge will provide essential qualities to a vibrant community life and responsible citizenship. The teaching of history at all levels must be promoted by well trained and enthusiastic teachers and lecturers. The reading culture of society must be supported by well stocked libraries and the availability of electronic media. Newspapers, radio and television must stimulate critical thinking about the past. Cultural museums and heritage sites must constantly remind people of their common roots and proud ancestors. Thus the history of South Africa will be constantly re-assessed and re-written, not because previous historians produced poor histories, but because the context within which their histories were written, has dramatically changed.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Article metrics loading...


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error