1887

oa De Rebus - A further look at s 204(2) of the criminal procedure act

Volume 1998, Issue 364
  • ISSN : 0250-0329

 

Abstract

The decision in Mahomed v Attorney-General of Natal & Others 1996 (1) SACR 139 (N) has brought about a very interesting development in our courts' application of s 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. According to this decision (per Howard JP, Wilson J concurring), when a witness is warned under s 204(1)(a) (the Act's 'indemnity' section), he acquires a right - or at least a legitimate expectation - to a discharge, if the questions are answered frankly and honestly. He is therefore entitled, before the decision can be made, to a hearing in terms of the audi alteram partem principle.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/derebus/1998/364/AJA02500329_6340
1998-05-01
2016-12-10

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error