1887

oa De Rebus - Kollig op aansoeke om verlof tot appèl - waarom geen redes deur hoogste howe? : feature

Volume 2013, Issue 536
  • ISSN : 0250-0329

 

Abstract


The small claims court, magistrates' courts, Labour Court and the High Court of South Africa are required by statute to provide motivated reasons for findings and judgments handed down by them.
There are no such obligations on the Supreme Court of Appeal or the Constitutional Court. These courts accordingly do not, as a rule, provide reasons for their decisions in response to applications for leave to appeal.
This situation is unfortunate. The provision of reasons by a judicial officer, , explains to the parties and to the public at large who have an interest in courts being open and transparent, why the decisions in a case were taken. It is a discipline that curbs arbitrary judicial decisions. It is also contrary to the provisions of s 1 of the Constitution, which requires judges not to act arbitrarily and to be accountable. The manner in which the courts ordinarily account for their decisions is by furnishing reasons.
It is accordingly suggested that the relevant statutes should also make it obligatory for the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal to provide reasons for a decision regarding an application for leave to appeal to these courts.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/derebus/2013/536/EJC143656
2013-11-01
2016-12-09

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error