oa Fundamina : A Journal of Legal History - La corruzione elettorale nel

Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN : 1021-545X
  • E-ISSN: 2411-7870



The so-called , probably written in 64 BC and ascribed to Quintus Tullius Cicero (the younger brother of Marcus), provides some knowledge and understanding of the problem of corruption in the electoral competitions in the late Roman republic.

In the - a private letter apparently sent to Marcus by Tullius â?? a number of useful suggestions for winning the for the election of the consuls for the year 63 (in which Marcus was a candidate and gained victory) are found.
It is possible to draw some indications from the text about the phenomenon of financial corruption in the electoral competitions which was persecuted as by two different comitial laws , namely the (81 BC) and the (67 BC).
The contents of these laws appears highly uncertain and contradictory since the fight against corruption had no ethical or legal purpose. It was simply one of several instruments used in the political fight with the aim to eliminate the financial power of the antagonists.
Marcus, as , could not rely on money and wealth, but his and allowed him to aim at success. The Cicero brothers therefore had an interest - as the reveals - in supporting anti-corruption legislation.
After having been elected as consul, Marcus continued his fight against corruption, always for his personal interest as . With this purpose, he proposed to the (that approved it) a new that greatly increased the prohibitions of the , forbidding the to do many things that were previously allowed (offering and public banquets, paying - people employed to follow and assist the candidate - or - fellows charged to distribute money in the and - etc), and that were expressly suggested in the same as allowable instruments.
But Cicero's interests quickly changed, as appears from his in defence of Lucius Licinius Murena, for the year 62, who was accused - with very good arguments - by the jurist Servius Sulpicius Rufus (a personal friend of Marcus) for open violations of the same . Prosecuting Marcus' political career was evidently no longer worth continuing the fight against electoral corruption.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Article metrics loading...


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error