1887

n South African Journal on Human Rights - The importance of minority judgments in judicial decision-making : an analysis of Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Prince - case note

Volume 35 Number 4
  • ISSN : 0258-7203
  • E-ISSN: 1996-2126
This article is unavailable for purchase outside of Africa

 

Abstract

Dissent plays an important role in judicial decision-making and can have a far-reaching impact on the development of law. It is therefore important to analyse the role that dissenting judgments plays in legal decision-making and question how dissenting arguments influence the functioning of a court and, in this instance, specifically the Constitutional Court. This case note analyses the judgment in Prince v President, Cape Law Society (2002) and traces how the dissenting judgment became the majority decision in Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Prince (2018). The case note highlights the need for contextual evidence in judicial decision-making and its importance in understanding the wider impact legal decisions might have.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/10520/EJC-1ceba414c7
2020-12-01
2020-06-05

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error