1887

n Annual Survey of South African Law - Civil and constitutional procedure and jurisdiction

Volume 2006, Issue 1
  • ISSN : 0376-4605
USD

 

Abstract

The proper approach to disputes of fact in application proceedings is a recurrent theme. The rule in 1984 (3) SA 623 (A) at 634H is well-entrenched as the guide to whose version should prevail in such cases. But should it be? In 2006 (5) SA 524 (SE) the court was faced with an urgent application involving a dispute over rights to bury a deceased person. The respondent, the mother of the deceased, disputed that the applicant was the deceased's common law wife as claimed. The funeral was two days away, leaving no time for a referral to oral evidence. The court advocated a robust approach. It considered a departure from the rule in to be appropriate (para 9).

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_assal/2006/1/EJC52265
2006-01-01
2016-12-09

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error