1887

n Annual Survey of South African Law - Bill of Rights jurisprudence

Volume 2008, Issue 1
  • ISSN : 0376-4605
USD

 

Abstract

As discussed below under Freedom and Security of the Person, in 2008 (3) SA 355 (SCA), the Supreme Court of Appeal held that the common-law rule allowing the arrest of a defendant in order to found or confirm jurisdiction is unconstitutional. The appeal court exercised its broad power to develop the common law in terms of section 39(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 to abolish the practice of jurisdictional arrest and to adopt what Howie P referred to as 'a legally acceptable substitute practice' (para [51]). This practice is that where attachment of property is not possible, a High Court has jurisdiction if the summons is served on the defendant while in South Africa and 'there is sufficient connection between the suit and the area of jurisdiction of the court concerned so that disposal of the case by that court is appropriate and convenient' (para [59]).

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_assal/2008/1/EJC52356
2008-01-01
2016-12-10

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error