1887

n South African Journal of Criminal Justice - Criminal procedure : recent cases

Volume 21, Issue 3
  • ISSN :
USD

 

Abstract

A number of interesting points for comment arise from this. The first is that, from the small portion of the trial record produced in the judgment of Pickering J it is quite clear that the magistrate was hopelessly incompetent and did not have a clue as to how to go about conducting a trial. It is disturbing to note that someone of such low calibre can attain the rank and status of a magistrate. Secondly, the accused were undefended and hence required the assistance of the magistrate in conducting their defences. This was not done and instead the magistrate attempted to trap the accused by drawing an adverse inference when they came to testify that they were raising alibi defences for the first time.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_sajcj/21/3/EJC52947
2008-01-01
2016-12-09

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error