1887

n South African Journal on Human Rights - Judicial rights talk : defects in the liberal challenge to constitutional review

Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN : 0258-7203
USD

 

Abstract

A treatment of recent criticism of judicial review concentrating on its theoretical consistency, scope and the use it makes of factual premises regarding the composition of judicial argument and the practice of democratic assemblies. Focussing on the work of Jeremy Waldron and Mark Tushnet and to a lesser extent that of Thomas Poole, it concludes that there are serious difficulties with the liberal challenge on each front.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_sajhr/22/2/EJC53213
2006-01-01
2016-12-11

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error