1887

n South African Law Journal - Revisiting the judge-made rule of non-interference in internal company matters

Volume 127, Issue 2
  • ISSN : 0258-2503
USD

 

Abstract

The main focus of this article is on the reasons why the courts have been reluctant to interfere in internal company matters. An analysis of numerous older English cases in particular indicates that these reasons vary considerably. These reasons are listed and discussed. Although it was never stated explicitly, the rule in (establishing the proper plaintiff rule) provided one of the most convenient excuses for later courts not to consider the merits of internal company disputes. Hence, established a strong precedent for non-interference in internal company matters. However, the article also examines other circumstances where the courts were prepared to interfere in internal company matters: these include several highly complex and often irreconcilable exceptions to the rule in . Over time there was a shift away from the original reasons for non-interference by the courts to a more prominent focus on the powers of directors. This eventually led to the proper purpose doctrine. However, these developments were slow and took place over more than a hundred years.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/ju_salj/127/2/EJC53917
2010-01-01
2016-12-10

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error