n Evidence Based Summaries in Dentistry - Laboratory versus controlled clinical trial results : high-viscosity glass-ionomers in comparison to amalgam for tooth restorations

Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN : 2223-5353


Summarised from:

Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Do Laboratory Results concerning High-ViscosityGlass-Ionomers versus Amalgam for Tooth Restorations Indicate Similar Effect Direction and Magnitude than that of Controlled Clinical Trials? - A Meta-Epidemiological Study. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0132246.

A large percentage of evidence concerning dental interventions is based on laboratory research. A simple PubMed search (27 August 2014) of the dental literature published between 2009 - 2014, using the broad MeSH terms "Dental Amalgam" and "Glass Ionomer Cements" reveals a 2-3, as well as an over 7 times higher number of listed citations of laboratory (including in-vitro and animal based in-vivo) studies than of prospective clinical studies with control groups (including randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, split-mouth trials and prospective 2-arm observational studies), respectively. The apparent wealth of laboratory evidence is sometimes used as basis for clinical inference and recommendations for daily dental practice.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Article metrics loading...


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error