n Journal of Minimum Intervention in Dentistry - Cariostatic effect of resin-modified GlC versus compomers - a quantitative systematic review

Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN : 1998-801X


To assess whether resin-modified glass ionomer cements have the same cariostatic effect than compomers.

The trials were identified from a search of the PubMed database on 5 January 2009 using the terms: ((("Dental Carles:[Mesh] OR "Dental Carles Susceptibility"[Mesh] OR "Root Carles"(Mesh])) AND "Glass lanomer Cements"[Mesh]) AND "Compomers"[Mesh]. References of accepted articles were checked for additional studies sui1able tor inclusion.
Randomized / quasi-randomized control trial with relevance to review question including computable data; published in English.
The systematic literature search found 86 trials of which 8 were identified to be in line with the inclusion criteria. From the reviewed trials 28 individual datasets were extracted. A total of 24 datasets could be pooled into 5 separate meta-analyses. No meta-analysis was possible for the remaining 4 datasets due to clinical / methodological heterogeneity.
The overall results show no difference between both materials, except for one trial indicating a 22% less chance of caries on resin-modified glass-ionomer restoration margins In permanent teeth after 6 years (RR 1.22; 95%Cl 1.06-1.40; P = 0.005). However these results may an overestimation due to selection bias effect.
The overall evidence suggests that resin-modified glass ionomer cements have the same cariostatic effect than compomers.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Article metrics loading...


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error