1887

n Journal of Minimum Intervention in Dentistry - Microleakage of GIC and resin composite filling materials - a quantitative systematic review

Volume 3, Issue 3
  • ISSN : 1998-801X
USD

 

Abstract

To appraise and present detailed quantitative evidence in answer to the review question, whether in patients with comparable caries risk, GIC material show less microleakage than resin composite materials.


The trials were identified from a search of the PubMed database on 05 January 2008 using the terms: ("Dental Caries"[Mesh] OR "Dental Caries Susceptibility"[Mesh] OR "Root Caries"[Mesh] OR "Tooth Demineralization" [Mesh]) AND ("Glass Ionomer Cements"[Mesh] OR "Cermet Cements"[Mesh]) AND "Dental Leakage"[Mesh] AND ("Composite Resins" [Mesh]). LILACS was systematically searched for articles reporting on clinical trials up to 07 April 2008. The string of text search terms: Microinfilt$ and resin$ and ionomer$ was used.
Relevant to review question; Published in English and Portuguese language; In-vivo or In-situ study design; Randomized controlled trials; Included reviews: Qualitative and quantitative systematic reviews
The systematic literature search found 61 trials of which none was identified to be in line with the inclusion criteria.
The literature search did not identify articles in compliance with the broad inclusion criteria. Therefore no systematic literature review and data analysis was possible. In order to answer the review question more studies are needed. It is recommended that reporting of such studies should follow the CONSORT statement.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/mident/3/3/EJC75739
2010-01-01
2016-12-09

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error