1887

oa Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology - A retrospective analysis comparing clinical staging with magnetic resonance imaging staging in patients with cervical cancer : original research

Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN : 2074-2835

 

Abstract

This single-institution retrospective study compares the accuracy of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging of cervical cancer. For patients who underwent surgery, MRI and clinical staging were compared to final pathological stage. Pathological stage was utilised as the reference standard.


One hundred and twenty-eight patients underwent MRI and 45 proceeded to surgery. There was concurrence between MRI staging and pathological stage in only 29.3% of patients. MRI overestimated staging in 53.6% of the patients, and underestimated staging in 17.1%. The comparison between clinical staging and pathological stage indicated concurrences in 43.9% of the patients. Stage was overestimated in 19.5% and was underestimated in 36.6%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two staging options.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/mp_sajgo/5/1/EJC136690
2013-01-01
2016-12-11

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error